All add-ons currently require PHP 7.4 or greater.

On July 4th 2024 PHP 8.2 will be the new minimum requirement for all add-ons. Expect any add-on released after that date to require 8.2 or greater. Some releases may not immediately take advantage of 8.x specific features in PHP, which means you might, be able to continue using new releases in PHP 7.4, however, if you experience an error the first thing you should do is update to PHP 8.2 then create a support ticket if the error persists.

Please read about the changes to BoldMinded add-on licensing.

Ticket: required relationship atom in bloq, highlights all relationship bloqs in red even though others are not set to required

Status Resolved
Add-on / Version Bloqs 4.4.1
Severity
EE Version 5.4.0

Michael Coogan

Dec 11, 2020

set one relationships atom to be required and validation highlights all relationship atoms in the entry red even though the others aren’t set to required. Let me know and I’ll dm an image in slack if needed.

#1

BoldMinded (Brian)

Can you edit the ticket and attach a screenshot here instead of in slack so everything is on one place?

#2

BoldMinded (Brian)

Can you also provide more details… does this occur when you click the save button and the page reloads, or is it part of the Ajax validation? Maybe a video displaying the issue would help so I can accurately replicate it locally.

#3

Michael Coogan

Comment has been marked private.

#4

BoldMinded (Brian)

Thanks for the video. To confirm this doesn’t prevent saving the entry? Just incorrectly adding the error class to other Relationship fields?

#5

Michael Coogan

correct…it’s just that field that triggers entry from not saving. Functionally, everything is working fine.

#6

BoldMinded (Brian)

Add this to the end of the Bloqs css file in the themes folder and see if it fixes it:

// BS rule to fix some really broad CSS in EE5 when there is an error in a field.
.fieldset-invalid .field-control .blocksft .grid-relationship .fields-select {
    border-color: #ccc;
    box-shadow: none;
}

Login to reply